My last post started with the assertion that in my estimation there are 7 Tier One theatre groups in the Washington, DC (DMV) area. This naturally suggests other tier in the rich world of this particular regional theatre, and that would be true. The DMV is home to over 40 incorporated theatrical companies and conglomerates. I dare say that it is only second to New York City. And so there are B Tier companies like Woolly Mammoth, Synetic Theatre, and Imagination Stage, and C Tier like Metro Stage, Mosaic Theatre, Constellation Theatre and 1st Stage (there are also D Tier--and excellence can be found at every level).
1st Stage is located on the backside of a strip mall off of the Dulles Airport Hwy just outside of the beltway in Tysons Corner, VA. In fact, it feels like it's tucked so far into the corner of Tysons Corner that locating it is akin to finding buried treasure! At $39 for general admission to all productions for an adult ticket, it is also a theatre that is more than worth the effort to experience.
"The Brothers Size" caught my attention because of its author--Tarell Alvin McCraney--and his authorship of the story that became the Academy Award winning film "Moonlight". I have come to expect works by contemporary playwrights to be mediocre by comparison to well established members of the iconoclast ranks. I also accept that my depth of experience is pathetically shallow, and still when I first discover a true talent, I feel like I've just cured some horrible disease, right?
Well, Tarell Alvin McCraney is well established in the ranks of contemporary playwrights and this work demonstrates with ample craft and intention exactly why. It is a compelling and emotionally engaging exploration of Black Male relationships (and honestly, I could have omitted the disaggregation Black save for the intentions of the author). The brothers Size share a mother, a history and a home. Ogun the elder has been the good brother. Oshoosi the younger has been the miscreant, the loose player, the prince, and for his indiscretions he has served time in prison. There he befriend Elegba, another local black ne'er-do-well. The play covers a couple of days wherein Elegba's continued penchant for playing outside of the established order falsely incriminated Oshoosi threatening to return them both to prison. The drama is thick and interwoven to create a tight blanket of love, despair, conflict, and forgiveness. Redemption is left off, a thread for another time?
In this amazing play comes three talented and intense actors. The story is written like a clock with three cogs. They are all constantly moving, but depending upon the position of the hour hand on the clock face of the story, their role rises or falls in the spotlight. Every man was given a moment--more than one--truth be told. And each executed their role with perfect accuracy against the hour of the play.
I am often asked about the quality of education at my school or any other school. There is this presumption that a finer building or a better neighborhood automatically means a better education. Of course, this is bullshit. The same is true for the theatre. The classroom is no worse or no better than the teacher, and the play no better or no worse than the actor. This production was profoundly moving on the sole advantage of the actors. I left feeling very satisfied all round. Pitty tomorrow's the final performance.
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Folger Shakespeare Theatre: Nell Gwynn
There are by estimation 7 Tier One Theatres in the Washington, DC area (Arena Stage, Folgers Shakespeare Theatre, Olney Theatre Center, Round House Theatre, Shakespeare Theatre Company, Signature Theatre, and Studio Theatre) Of these, the most intimate is the Folgers. It is also the best value of the bunch. I do love attending plays there, and rarely walk away disappointed. Such is the quality that I've come to expect that sometimes even a really good production leaves me wanting more. "Nell Gwynn" was a really good production, and I will commence to singing its praises momentarily; however, permit me to first dispense with my objection.
When everything about a production seems wonderful, but I am unsatisfied, I tend to allow myself latitude (peppered with a certain arrogance, to be sure) to consider factors outside of the people who are directly responsible for this production's control. In this case, I place my disappointment squarely upon the shoulders of the playwright herself. There no doubt that Jessica Swale is brilliant. Her staging and dialogue are pitch perfect. Her overall vision for the work in my experience was her Achilles Tendon, if you will. The central character is Nell Gwynn, who was one of the very first women to perform on the English stage during the time of Charles II and after the passing of William Shakespeare. To tell her story isn't she writing an historical biography? But it's also a witty comedy? With music, so it's also a musical? Is the music in service to the historical accuracy? or is it meant to enhance the comedy? And is it a good historical biography that happens to include humorous anecdotes? Or is it a comedy using the motif of an historical biography to bring form to the humor? OR is it just an overly ambitious attempt to do all of this that in spite of its brilliance comes up short? BINGO! While I loved--that is LOVED!--nearly every single moment and all the supporting aspects of the play, as a unified creation it was two porous to hold my attention over the scope of its reign. I don't know if you've ever experienced anything like this yourself, but it's awfully disconcerting.
So let me put the play as a literary work aside and focus on the particulars.
What fun! The cast is superb. Their ability to hit the mark with the humor was time and again fresh and delightful. Even the bit players were so well performed that the ensemble took on the necessity of a house of cards where no one could be thought of as expendable. In particular I loved the performance of Christopher Dinolfo as Edward Kynaston the legendary "female" lead at a time when women were not permitted to act. His character is the jilted lover tossed from the limelight by the audacious Nell Gwynn with nothing but his flair for the dramatic with which to fight back. His performance was hilarious throughout and the very epitome of the entire casts' robust commitment to their characters. Michael Glenn is a local favorite of mine, and in the role of the hapless playwright, John Dryden he excelled at the "accommodator turned sincere truth-teller on a dime" persona. And even though you figured out that his character would go there, it never failed to feel fresh and surprising--an example of the Ms. Swale's genius. The final shoutout goes to Catherine Flye as Nancy, the sweet, maternal at times yet dimwitted with a naughty edge stage manager etc. of the little theatre company. In some ways, one of the the minor characters, but by my count a major comedic force. Her sarcastic zingers never missed the bull's eye of the audience's funny bones.
Add to the excellent acting, a beautiful and production specific sound score, sumptuous costumes, and a set that was both geometrically simple and functionally perfect---and well, honestly, it is a production well worth seeing, even if it left me wanting something more structurally cohesive.
When everything about a production seems wonderful, but I am unsatisfied, I tend to allow myself latitude (peppered with a certain arrogance, to be sure) to consider factors outside of the people who are directly responsible for this production's control. In this case, I place my disappointment squarely upon the shoulders of the playwright herself. There no doubt that Jessica Swale is brilliant. Her staging and dialogue are pitch perfect. Her overall vision for the work in my experience was her Achilles Tendon, if you will. The central character is Nell Gwynn, who was one of the very first women to perform on the English stage during the time of Charles II and after the passing of William Shakespeare. To tell her story isn't she writing an historical biography? But it's also a witty comedy? With music, so it's also a musical? Is the music in service to the historical accuracy? or is it meant to enhance the comedy? And is it a good historical biography that happens to include humorous anecdotes? Or is it a comedy using the motif of an historical biography to bring form to the humor? OR is it just an overly ambitious attempt to do all of this that in spite of its brilliance comes up short? BINGO! While I loved--that is LOVED!--nearly every single moment and all the supporting aspects of the play, as a unified creation it was two porous to hold my attention over the scope of its reign. I don't know if you've ever experienced anything like this yourself, but it's awfully disconcerting.
So let me put the play as a literary work aside and focus on the particulars.
What fun! The cast is superb. Their ability to hit the mark with the humor was time and again fresh and delightful. Even the bit players were so well performed that the ensemble took on the necessity of a house of cards where no one could be thought of as expendable. In particular I loved the performance of Christopher Dinolfo as Edward Kynaston the legendary "female" lead at a time when women were not permitted to act. His character is the jilted lover tossed from the limelight by the audacious Nell Gwynn with nothing but his flair for the dramatic with which to fight back. His performance was hilarious throughout and the very epitome of the entire casts' robust commitment to their characters. Michael Glenn is a local favorite of mine, and in the role of the hapless playwright, John Dryden he excelled at the "accommodator turned sincere truth-teller on a dime" persona. And even though you figured out that his character would go there, it never failed to feel fresh and surprising--an example of the Ms. Swale's genius. The final shoutout goes to Catherine Flye as Nancy, the sweet, maternal at times yet dimwitted with a naughty edge stage manager etc. of the little theatre company. In some ways, one of the the minor characters, but by my count a major comedic force. Her sarcastic zingers never missed the bull's eye of the audience's funny bones.
Add to the excellent acting, a beautiful and production specific sound score, sumptuous costumes, and a set that was both geometrically simple and functionally perfect---and well, honestly, it is a production well worth seeing, even if it left me wanting something more structurally cohesive.
Another thing about the Folger Shakespeare Theatre, because of its particular design (meant to evoke a sense of Shakespeare's own iconic Globe theatre) there are a handful of seats from which unfettered visual access of the full stage is not possible without some squirming or extending of one's position in the seat. As a result, these seat of marketed as having an "obstructed view" thus costing slightly less than 50% the of the price of the next cheapest seat. I have come to appreciate their discount, and have to trouble at all leaning forward in order to catch some action which is just outside of the given range of view. Ergo, I attended the performance for $34 dollars while the couple sitting directly to my right paid $134 dollars for their two seats. As you can see, my general view was quite good, and I can assure you, I had no qualms about leaning forward when necessary!
Thursday, February 21, 2019
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Earth Stamps: Banned Books
I love design. For many years now, I have created commemorative and definitive stamp issues under the auspices of Earth Stamps. I'm going to start sharing them here. Hope you enjoy them, too. The denominations are arbitrary. Here is a sheet honoring some of the books that have been banned over the years. A celebration of freedom from censorship.
Snow Day Project
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
Smithsonian National Zoo: 10 Views +4, Small Mammal House
+4.1 Fennec Fox, Vulpes zerda
+4.2 Golden-headed Lion Tamarin, Leontopithecus chrysomelas
+4.3 Geoffroy's Marmoset, Callithrix geoffroyi
+4.4 Sandcat, Felix margarita
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)